Friday, November 23, 2012

Environmental Treaties... and their failure


One of my subjects in environmental studies is “Environmental Law”. I know, it sounds boring, but in reality it’s fascinating. It’s a good way to learn how the world works at political level, both national and international. Unfortunately until now I haven’t seen much good, and it’s all quite sad.   

It’s a fact that we’re in an economic crisis, so governments are focusing on spending less and less money, meaning that all the things that have to do with the environment looses importance, and barely any money is invested in environmental projects.  

Besides, most of the international treaties and protocols are not law-binding; they are merely recommendations. Thus many things concerning the environment a lot of countries agreed on in the past are now being ignored. Examples are the following;

The Convention on Biological Diversity is a treaty from 1992 signed by 153 countries, with the following goals; conservation of biological diversity; sustainable use of its components; and fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from genetic resources. It was about stopping biodiversity loss by the year 2010. All very well, but in all those years no country has actually taken solid measures to stop biodiversity loss, and now, in 2012, it continues increasing so rapidly that scientists call this a new mass-extinction period.

Another example is the Earth Summit 2002. It came 10 years after the first Earth summit in Rio, but its results were very disappointing; most of the compromises consisted in a very limited way to simply “support” international organizations who worked on sustainable development. The lack of financial investments has made it impossible to reach the goal once set to reduce to half by 2015 the amount of people who live on less than 1 dollar a day, who are starving and who have no access to drinkable water or sanitary services.

This is all very sad. Surely, I don’t like the lack of initiatives to reduce biodiversity loss, but the lack of initiatives to help combat poverty is truly a big mistake.  And there is an enormous lack of initiatives in every single aspect of sustainable development.

So, I really believe that governments are wrong in not investing in sustainable development. Their goal is; getting back to the economically thriving system that once worked well before the economic crisis.  But this is madness; you can’t try to go back to one system and once you’ve invested billions of dollars in it then you try to create a new system (that of sustainable development). This is the right moment to really focus on creating a global, sustainable system. 

Besides, all the recent Earth Summits and treaties and conventions have all just been disappointing; none of them has really induced a change, and are mostly about “one day” we will start being sustainable in an economic, social and ecological way. Surely that “one day” will be when we have messed up everything so badly there is no future left for us and the next generations…

THIS is why I want to work at the United Nations; exactly for this reason; to prevent lack of initiatives, lack of interest, fear of changing a system that is rotten anyway. I want to see a change in the world, for better. Not for me, but all those who come after me. We are so selfish, only thinking about short term solutions that just put us deeper and deeper in trouble, instead of thinking what is right for all living beings and the Earth, and in terms of many, many generations.

We need change. To hold onto old beliefs and systems is to avoid growth and wisdom. We should not fear change, not if it means a better future for all.

This is what I believe, dear people. Thank you for reading, and if you are interested in some of the famous treaties and conventions; 

No comments:

Post a Comment